An independently written introduction based on the source's bibliographic record and abstract, separating source type, principal content and limitations. It is not a full-text translation.
About this resource
A single-blind, three-group, four-week study in 90 participants. It is rare direct human evidence, but its design and reported values require careful source-level reading.
Shirani-Boroujeni M, et al. Journal of Renal Injury Prevention. 2017;6(2):127-131.
Evidence or source type
This page identifies the material as the following source type: Single-blind randomized trial. Whole plants, extracts, isolated compounds, laboratory studies and human studies carry different evidential meanings.
An independently written introduction based on the source's bibliographic record and abstract, separating source type, principal content and limitations. It is not a full-text translation.
What it contributes
Its principal contribution to this collection is summarized below.
A single-blind, three-group, four-week study in 90 participants. It is rare direct human evidence, but its design and reported values require careful source-level reading.
Limitations
The following limitation should be read before interpreting the source.
It is small, short, single-center and limited in blinding/reporting, so it cannot establish general efficacy or safety.
Safety and interpretation
Syrian rue contains beta-carboline alkaloids, and the collection includes research on MAO activity, drug-metabolizing enzymes and poisoning reports. Laboratory activity and records of traditional use do not establish clinical efficacy or general safety in humans. Drug interactions, neurological, gastrointestinal and cardiovascular signs, and variation among preparations require separate evaluation. This page provides neither instructions for use nor diagnosis or treatment advice.
Ayurveda / Soma context
Iranian/Persian traditional use, references within South Asian medical systems, and the Vedic/Iranian Soma/Haoma identification proposal are distinct questions. This collection keeps traditional records, analytical work and historical-linguistic hypotheses separate.
Original source and reuse
This page is an independently written detailed introduction, not a full translation or reproduction of figures and tables. Check reuse terms at the linked source and defer to the original record for numbers and conclusions.